Peran Work-Life Balance: Hubungan Antara Otonomi Kerja dan Keterlibatan Kerja Pada Pendidikan Tinggi di Indonesia

M Halim; Yuni Siswanti; Tiara Juniar Soewardi; Aldini Nofta Martini Martini

doi:10.69693/general.v2i1.32

Authors

M Halim Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
Yuni Siswanti Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
Tiara Juniar Soewardi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
Aldini Nofta Martini Martini Universitas Lembah Dempo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69693/general.v2i1.32

Keywords:

Otonomi Pekerjaan, Keterlibatan Kerja

Abstract

Introduction: This study extends previous research that uncovers the relationship between job autonomy and work engagement, and examines the mediating effect of work-life balance on lecturers in Indonesian higher education.

Methods: We collected research data using an online survey of lecturers in Indonesian higher education, and analyzed the data.

Results: As a result of the research data analysis, we found that there is a mediating effect of work-life balance.

Conclusion and suggestion: As a result of the research data analysis, we found that there is a mediating effect of work-life balance. Future studies should analyze samples from different countries with different cultures and institutions to compare the results or use these variables as control variables. It is necessary to include different types of companies in the sample or to examine whether there are differences in the results of the study depending on the size of the company or industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, TD, Golden, TD, & Shockley, KM (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological science in the public interest, 16(2), 40-68.

Bagozzi, RP, & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94

Bakker, AB, & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology.

Bakker, AB, & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career development international.

Bakker, AB, Shimazu, A., Demerouti, E., Shimada, K., & Kawakami, N. (2014). Work engagement versus workaholism: A test of the spillover-crossover model. Journal of Managerial Psychology.

Baron, RM, & Kenny, DA (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173– 1182.

Beauregard, TA, & Henry, LC (2009). Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance. Human resource management review, 19(1), 9-22.

Brough, P., Timms, C., O'Driscoll, MP, Kalliath, T., Siu, OL, Sit, C., & Lo, D. (2014). Work–life balance: A longitudinal evaluation of a new measure across Australia and New Zealand workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(19), 2724-2744.

Chen, Z., & Powell, GN (2012). No pain, no gain? A resource-based model of work-to- family enrichment and conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(1), 89-98.

Clark, SC (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human relations, 53(6), 747-770.

De Clercq, D., & Brieger, SA (2021). When Discrimination is Worse, Autonomy is Key: How Women Entrepreneurs Leverage Job Autonomy Resources to Find Work–Life Balance. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-18.

Greenhaus, JH, Collins, KM, & Shaw, JD (2003). The relation between work–family balance and quality of life. Journal of vocational behavior, 63(3), 510-531.

Greenhaus, JH, & Powell, GN (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work- family enrichment. Academy of management review, 31(1), 72-92.

Hair, JF, Black, WC, Babin, BJ, & Anderson, RE (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson New International Edition (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Johari, J., Tan, FY, & Zulkarnain, ZIT (2018). Autonomy, workload, work-life balance and job performance among teachers. International Journal of Educational Management.

Kalliath, T., & Brough, P. (2008). Work–life balance: A review of the meaning of the balance construct. Journal of management & organization, 14(3), 323-327.

Ministry of Finance. (2020). Decree of the Minister of Finance Number 223/KMK.01/2020 concerning the Implementation of Flexible Working Space in the Ministry of Finance.

Kreitner, R. and Kinicki, A. 2011. Organizational Behavior. Ninth Edition. New York:Mc Grawhill.

Morgeson, FP, & Humphrey, SE (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of applied psychology, 91(6), 1321.

Nunnally, JC, & Bernstein, IH (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGRAW-HILL, INC.

Schaufeli, WB, Salanova, M., González-romá, V., & Bakker, AB (2002).The measurement of engagement and burn out: a two–sample confirmatory factor analytic approach Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.

Schaufeli, WB, & Bakker, AB (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.

Schaufeli, WB, Bakker, AB, & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and psychological measurements, 66(4), 701-716.

Sullivan, C. (2012). Remote working and work-life balance. In Work and quality of life (pp. 275-290). Springer, Dordrecht.

Palumbo, R. (2020). Let me go to the office! An investigation into the side effects of working hybrid on work-life balance. International Journal of Public Sector Management.

Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, SK (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied psychology, 70(1), 16- 59.